We “inserted screws” into all five modern browsers, testing them according to various parameters. If you are looking for a fast, efficient, convenient browser, we have found two that we think you will like.
The best browsers go beyond indicators, competing with both real web pages and standard programs. They are easy to configure, flexible and non-capricious, and can be connected to other devices and servers in the ecosystem.
Do you live in Belgium, but Dutch or French is not your native language? But the experiment, implemented in 7 study guides, suggests that there is at least a good reason to use it. Some accuse him of being too slow, others believe that he is not very ergonomic. We are often interested in the speed of browsers or their resource consumption. But what about energy consumption? However, the gap is only two minutes. But you can also do this test to find out which browser you should use when you are away from hold.
Listen, do a few tests and stop there anyway, nothing to do. Just as you expect us to check the video card of the latest games, we also think that your browsers should be checked for working sites. Can they handle dozens of tabs at once? Or do they shudder, fight, or break, chewing on the processor and memory of your computer?
Various optimization and implementation strategies
The world of web browsers is booming. But, at present, which web browser to choose? However, he suffers from his monochrome character, which punishes him with multi-core machines compared to competitors. Regarding standards, four browsers remain very close. The strategy of various publishers is also changing here.
The editor continues to lose the battle of browsers. Therefore, users of the system are ordinary navigation. They do not seem to want to contact the editor again. It’s easy to navigate thanks to a feature called “automatic completion”, which allows you to find the address you were looking for, even if you don’t know its perfection. In addition, a single tide will bring you all your viewing opportunities, gaining space for viewing. The “favorite” function is even more subtle, which allows you to immediately get to your favorite sites.
To find out who is better, we chose Google Chrome, Microsoft’s EDGE and Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Opera for testing, with the exception of Apple’s abandoned Safari for Windows. We used the latest available version of every browser except Firefox, which was upgraded to Firefox 40 upon completion of our testing. And we also tried to look at each browser as a whole. How easy was it to install and configure each browser? Has Opera, for example, made it easier to switch from Chrome?
Reload the page is very simple, thanks to one to use this action. In particular, they will enjoy video clips and music tracks, thanks to significantly improved playback speed compared to the past. The presence of the button used in the summary of the site that you are going to buy to consult before the operation starts allows you not to get into telematic fraud. Many people wonder what is the best browser in the world. But among them is the best.
The answer to this question is complex, as both have excellent features and also have unique experience. The graphics of both browsers are both attractive and clean, allowing you to arrange all the interface elements as you like for a setting that can be completed in both cases, so today there is one winner between the two, but both browsers have features that stand out and differ apart from each other. Consumer protection goes even further by providing a special feature that removes all your personal data from your browsing history, thereby avoiding some sites that receive your personal information.
For 2015, we have a newbie: Microsoft’s Edge browser, which has been integrated into Windows 10.
You have already seen part of our tests, where we showed you how many beneficial effects Adobe Flash can have on your system. Disabling or refusing to download Flash can seriously improve performance - some sites, such as YouTube, have begun the transition to a less intensive HTML5 stream processor. However, other readers have indicated that they just need to run Flash on their favorite sites. This is normal - we tested with and without Flash, so the browser will work best than anyone, anyway.
Last but not least, accessibility must be forgotten. Millions of Italians access the Internet through a wide range of devices: desktop computers, smartphones and tablets are some of the most popular devices. People go online daily for fun or for information, but also for work.
When it comes to choosing the best browser for navigation, you do not need to dwell exclusively on a purely aesthetic aspect, which in any case plays an important role from the user's point of view, but you need to understand in detail the technical characteristics of the product.
Oh yes, at the expense of Microsoft: we found that your new Edge browser is not as fast as you try to make it. (Unfortunately!) But he still showed a certain superiority over Internet Explorer.
Pros for Chrome and Firefox
We consider test cases to be a valuable measure of performance, but not fully determinative. However, these are the numbers that users want to see, so we must provide them. We used a Lenovo Yoga 12 laptop with an Intel Core 2.6 GHz i7-5600U processor inside, running a 64-bit copy of Windows 10 Pro on 8GB of memory, as a test platform.
This person will highlight the negative and positive aspects of the two browsers and help you determine which one to choose. In addition, we will examine in detail the characteristics of the two programs by analyzing some of the tests performed. You will also find technical information and a verdict that will crown the winner of the chapter.
Recently, several tests have been conducted to determine the best browser between them. These are the topics that, thanks to the collected data, we will analyze. Security and graphical user interface. . Phenomena such as identity theft, phishing and viruses are widespread and can cause serious problems. “The safety and privacy of people on the Internet are fundamental and should not be considered optional.”
We tested Chrome 44, Windows 10 Edge 12, Firefox 39, Internet Explorer 11, and Opera 31 on two popular (albeit unsupported) control tests - SunSpider 1.0.2 and Peacekeeper - for reference only. But we recommend that you pay attention to more modern types of tests, including Jet Stream, Octane 2.0, Speedometer and WebXPRT. The last two are especially useful as they try to reflect the actual interaction with web applications. We also tested using the Oort Online’s graphics test, as well as the standardized HTML5test - which are not so much tests as an assessment of how compatible the browser is with the HTML5 standard for developing web applications.
In today's world, navigation speed is important, especially for those who are browsing smartphones and want to quickly access information. The test was conducted using browsers in different situations. At rest, using 1 or 2 navigation boards under moderate loads, opening several boards and simulating live navigation, opening a larger number of maps with very heavy web pages. We will not be here to list all numbers and technical data on the case, but we will provide you with a detailed test report.
This is due to the fact that both browsers have good performance and do not overload the system with too many additional processes. The problem changes when it comes to opening multiple tabs and “binding” a bit using the browser.
In our testing, Chrome and Firefox took first place in the Speedometer and WebXPRT, respectively. Not surprisingly, Google was the fastest browser running Octane 2.0. But Microsoft’s Edge led the Jet Stream test, which includes SunSpider tests in which Edge also led. (For all tests, the larger the number of metrics, the better; the only exception is Sunspider, who starts scoring while it starts.)
Now let's move on to the part that we freely call graphics. To begin with, we will evaluate the graphics in terms of speed and quality of video playback and streaming. Next, we will judge the aspect of user experience by evaluating the design and usability of the two browsers.
The experiment accurately identified the quality of streaming and assigned a numerical rating to two programs. When it comes to graphic layout, the question is very subjective. We will look at the features offered by the two browsers, as well as how the tools are organized in different menus and submenus. Thanks to its minimalistic but well-structured design, the chaotic menu of red foxes is far ahead.
Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox did a good job here. (The higher the result, the better, except for the SunSpider test).
Surprisingly, Edge was ahead of the Jet Stream in the test, but was far behind the Speedometer, this information is necessary to write a reasonably reasonable result in WebXPRT. (Microsoft claims that the Edge is faster than Chrome, also according to the Google Octan test 2.0, but our results do not confirm this.)
In the light of the data that we showed, we determined the winner by evaluating the overall complexity of the main characteristics. This does not mean that both of these two excellent programs for viewing the network. Speed \u200b\u200bis the speed of viewing and the convenience of finding information. The browser is loaded with hidden tricks that can significantly streamline your Internet browsing and digital life.
Manage autocomplete settings
Then you can access them on any other device. This will allow him to have his own Internet experience separate from yours. Use the autocomplete settings to enter your address, password or credit card information every day.
Chrome failed on testing SunSpider; the only test on which Firefox also did not succeed was the Oort Online test, which draws a landscape similar to Minecraft using a browser.
For some reason, I noticed some graphical glitches as soon as Edge began to display the landscape in the Oort test, including problems with the image of the shadow that slipped through the bay in the night scene. But Ort turned out to be even more problematic for Firefox, depicting “snow” as flashing lights and rain as many lines. (We included the test result, but took it with a grain of salt.) Internet Explorer 11 just couldn't run the Oort test at all.
Open recently closed tabs.
You can use it to attach sites that you frequently visit so that they are always open when you need it. If you leave your window, you can return to where you left off by going to History. Check the tabs in the "Recently Closed" section and click on the tab you want to open. You can also go to the settings and select “Continue when you stopped” in the “During startup” section.
In omnibox, and then you can write a note. The garment has an elegant appearance, but also allows you to slide your finger across the fabric to control the smartphone without removing it from your pocket. We can definitely say that this is the first type of this kind of clothing that debuted on the market. However, there is now a better and easier way to unlock smartphones. Many of them have identified technology as the next big thing in the industry, but it seems that these charges were a bit overpriced. The final idea in this direction is to use a sophisticated AI program.
We also included an HTML5test compatibility test, which measures how compatible each browser is with the latest HTML5 web standards. Although some developers focus on the performance of each browser, even test developers do not trust them too much:
The HTML5test benchmark scores are less interesting to me than people think. Any browser that has scored above 400 points is perfect for today's network.
Security experts warn that there are still threats to consumer safety, but they are becoming less and less every day. The AI \u200b\u200bsystem can analyze predefined criteria, track application behavior to determine if users are at risk. It is important to note that despite such innovations, you should continue to carefully monitor what content you download to your smartphones to make sure that you are not hacked. According to unconfirmed information, the new device is likely to be presented by the end of the year.
And of course, the only one who failed this test is the nearly retired Internet Explorer 11.
What does all this mean? This does not mean the net victory of any particular browser, including Chrome. Based on our benchmark scores, many of the browsers will be able to handle the modern network simply at the highest level.
In today's article, we will look at the severity of two browsers. But how is it with harshness? During testing, 16 panels were opened in both browsers and ad units were installed. But his horror is incredible! This will not change much after the start of the video. But such exploitation of memory is cruel!
Both programs are also demanding on the processor, even when watching a video. Both programs have their users who do not want to convince them of the transition. And not just tight, but really great! Everything may differ from the add-ons that you install in your browser.
Real Testing: Opera is doing its job
Opera Software has always lived on the periphery, as NetApplications shows, only 1.34 percent of the global browser market falls on Opera Software. But, since Opera is considering an offer to sell, it probably won't last long. However, in terms of real-world performance, Opera browsers are worth a long and close look.
An unstable, frozen or other unreliable web browser is also unpleasant, as is the case with the operating system. This, of course, is due to where the website is gradually being promoted as a platform. Multi-platform web applications are emerging that harness the power of cloud computing. Current web applications are probably just the beginning of a new era.
In any case, from a certain point of view, the web browser itself becomes translated as an operating system, respectively. working environment. Of course, reliability for this task is much more important than simply displaying websites on which the user acts as a passive recipient of information.
Why? Because according to the test results, Chrome and Opera are functioning very well.
It is important to know how each browser will actually work when faced with a network “live”. This is difficult to test - some tricky websites constantly adjust their content, and ads will vary from one visit with testing to the next. But we tried to minimize the time during which we visited each site, which will help reduce the variability of the content.
However, with the increasing daily use of the Internet and the Internet, of course, the unreliability of a web browser is unpleasant even when searching for information and other basic network tasks. So what do the creators of leading web browsers do to make their browsers more reliable?
Separate launch of plug-ins and their activation on demand
Of course, with modern browsers, the ability to restore a session after a browser crash, restarting the computer or inadvertently closing the browser. The most common cause of web browser instability is plugins. At least the creators of the individual browsers agree. Some of them decided to separate the plug-ins from the main browser, so that any instability of the plug-in would not lead to the loss of the browser.
We used a sample of 30 existing sites, from Amazon to CNN and from iMore to PCWorld, as well as a subset of each three-tabs to see how performance scales. Our tests included adding each site in a new tab, one by one, to roughly understand what would happen if the user continues to add new tabs - but you need to do this quickly, so that the browser itself conducts a stress test. Finally, we evaluated them with Adobe Flash turned on and off. (Both Opera and Firefox did not initially respond to Flash, and so we tested them without it, only then downloaded the Flash plugin.)
After loading all 30 tabs, we waited 30 seconds, and then we deduced the total number of processor and memory consumption, as well as the application itself, background processes, and a separate Flash development course, subject to the necessary conditions.
So what does all this mean? If you own a mid-range and low-end computer, you may have purchased it with a small memory, or with a less powerful processor. In this case, you may consider switching to a more efficient browser.
This chart contains a lot of information; You can click on it to enlarge. But what you really need to focus on is the differences in memory consumption (yellow bars) and the differences in processor consumption. We have included the source data in the table at the bottom of the graph. In each case, the lower numbers indicate a more efficient browser, with one exception, Firefox (with Flash) with a score of zero, which we will discuss below.
Oddly enough, we noted an actual decrease in processor consumption when Flash was included in the three-tab test, in particular in Edge, Firefox and Opera itself - perhaps because the Flash plug-in was more efficient under light loads. As stated in a previous report, however, CPU and memory consumption increased when we started adding tab by tab in each browser.
Another mismatch you may notice is that Chrome, with Flash enabled, consumes almost as much memory as Edge consumes without Flash enabled. We checked it twice, but we did it the other day, when the Edge memory consumption was even higher than what we recorded. (This is probably due to the difference in the ads and videos that appear on the sites.)
Chrome is known for taking up all the memory you gave it, and the numbers prove it. But it also consumes relatively little of your processor - which, if you reduce the use of tabs, will make its impact on the computer manageable. Opera, however, shines here. In fact, without Flash, Opera consumes only 6.6 percent of the processor and 1.83GB of RAM during our stress test. With Flash turned on, Opera consumes 3.47GB of memory and 81.2 percent of my computer’s processor.
And Mozilla did very well, but with Flash turned on, the tabs essentially plunged into suspended animation until they were pressed, and then they started loading slowly. It was terrible. "Burying" tabs that are not yet used is acceptable, but please download them first, Mozilla!
Finally, we tried to load the pages, given how quickly the page became “navigable” - in other words, how soon you can scroll down. Fortunately, all the browsers we tested did this, although some of them were faster than others; Chrome and Opera did extremely well, especially with Flash turned off. In general, however, it can be said that any browser that can load pages in three seconds or less will meet your requirements. (Keep in mind that the page load time depends in part on your internet connection and the content of the page itself.)
Convenience factor
Since all of these browsers are free, ideally you should be able to download each of them and evaluate them for yourself. And each browser easily borrows the bookmarks and settings of its rivals, especially from Chrome and Internet Explorer. But manually exporting bookmarks is another story. This is almost the same as telling the browser that you are fed up with it - and Firefox, for example, “passively aggressive” buries the command to export bookmarks deep into the menu. Even stranger, Opera claims that you can export bookmarks from its Settings menu, and the import option apparently remained in Opera 31.
Many browsers, including Opera, currently allow you to synchronize information between multiple devices.
More and more, however, browsers are using a one-time password to identify you, store your bookmarks online, and allow you to switch from PC to PC, of \u200b\u200bcourse, provided that you continue to use the same browser.
Chrome, for example, configures itself on a new computer literally as easy as downloading a browser, installing it, and entering its username and password. You may need to double-check that the bookmarks bar is turned on, for example, and only after that, your saved bookmarks and passwords will be downloaded automatically. (As usual, make sure that the password wizard checked them for difficulty).
Chrome is not alone in this, either. Synchronization Firefox synchronizes tabs, bookmarks, passwords and favorites, while Opera synchronizes your bookmarks, tabs, home page for the Speed \u200b\u200bDial function, as well as favorites and settings.
This is an area where Edge needs to be improved. Edge can import favorites / bookmarks from other browsers manually, but not keep a permanent list of favorites everywhere - at least for now. But if you save the new “favorites” in IE11, it will be instantly available through other PCs. Other browsers - except Edge - also allow you to access desktop bookmarks within their respective mobile applications.
You can customize the Microsoft Edge homepage to show you information with which you could start your day. (IGoogle did this too, many years ago.)
It is also interesting that more and more, browsers are moving away from the concept of a “home page” in favor of something like Edge or Opera, where the browser opens with an index page, i.e. with news and information supervised by the browser company itself. But you still have the option of installing your own homepage in Chrome, Edge, and Firefox.
Honestly, all the browsers we tested were relatively easy to configure and install, and even with their own peculiarities - import bookmarks and settings, either from other browsers or from other settings. You may have your preferences, but here is a relative draw.
Out of Network
Modern browsers, however, go beyond just web surfing. Most of them come with some intangibles that you might not know about.
Maybe you would like a browser, for example, as a BitTorrent client. In the early days, you need to download a separate, specific program for this. Today, these features can be added using plugins or add-ons (additional features) that most browsers offer except Edge. (This may be more than convenient; Edge will store your passwords, but not in an encrypted password manager like LastPass.)
If there is at least one reason to use Firefox, it is because of the capabilities of the plugin. Mozilla has a website entirely dedicated to plugins, and they are grouped by type and popularity. Installing the plugin is as easy as clicking a couple of notifications and then restarting the browser. And given the market share of Chrome - and the popularity of Firefox plugins - you'll find developers who will focus on those first two. A good example is OneTab, which converts all of your open tabs into a text list, dramatically reducing the memory consumption of your browser. Please note that the more plugins you add and enable, the more memory and processor power your browser will consume.
Opera doesn’t seem to even have the approximate number of plugins available that Firefox has, but it does have a unique element: a “sidebar” along the left side that can be used for widgets, like a calculator or even Twitter posts. Opera also expands with themes-like wallpapers, but they are much less impressive.
Chrome hides many options to control what you see on the Internet, but only if you want to explore it.
You may also notice that there are browsers that add more and more functional rights to the application itself. Firefox includes a Firefox-to-Firefox video conferencing service called Firefox Hello, which runs right in your browser, and you can save web pages to the Pocket service for later reading. And this, the place where Edge shines is its digital assistant, Cortana, which is built right into it, and there are also Reading View options and a web page layout service called Web Notes. Cortana does an excellent job of providing context, and this is certainly one of the reasons to try Edge as a browser.
Right-click on the term and Microsoft Edge’s Cortana rushes to the rescue.
Over time, we believe that this will be one area where Edge and Chrome will try to “come off”, as it was before. In a way, this is like a race for office suite packages: the number of applications mimic the functionality that Microsoft Office had several years ago. But Microsoft began to improve Office, and Edge, raising them above competitors. Given that Chrome is a kind of “front door” to Google. Now on the PC, we can eventually see how Google is trying to get Cortana out of its native land.
Chrome nearly defeated Opera
So who wins? This is how we see it.
Merit and Honor: Edge's performance has improved to such an extent that it has become competitive, although it may not be what Microsoft is trying to show. However, the lack of extensibility and the actual synchronization drags it down, at least until they were added later this year. Firefox also worked just fine until it got stuck in our stress test. We also believe that Opera will be a terrific choice for you, as it passed the certification tests and tests in real practice the same way. Of course, he lacks a tough OS and integration services like in Chrome, IE, and Edge, but some can use this as a bonus too.
All of this suggests that we still think that Google’s Chrome is the best of this heap.
Chrome has a well-deserved reputation for stealing and eating up any available memory, and our tests prove it. But it is stable, extensible, works well, integrates into other servers, and reveals its depths and complexities only if you are actively looking for them. For this reason, Google Chrome remains the browser of our choice, and Opera in second place.
For some reason, I really wanted to switch to Google Chrome from my beloved Firefox, unbearably wanted, but it didn’t work out. A little lower - why he could not and how he could.
It just so happened that my first real browser was Maxton. I really loved maxton, maxton, the same old one, on the ie6 engine, still evokes positive emotions in me. It was the fault of Maxton that I became addicted to the ability to hide and show the browser by hotkey, sometimes called boss-key, but I didn’t need to hide from anyone, just the browser was always the most used application for me, and it’s incredibly convenient when you can quickly Switch from the active application to the browser and vice versa.
At the moment when life still forced to leave Maxton, it was this that initially served as the impetus for choosing Firefox instead of Chrome. Fireis has a wonderful plugin for this, but chrome, unfortunately, does not. Neither searching nor digging in the manuals helped me find a way to do this.
I got used to firearms, he fell in love with me, for a long time we were close friends, and now it’s more convenient for me to do some things in it. And it was he who hooked me on the stubby tabs and how cool they are when they are highlighted.
The reasons why I could not switch to Chrome suddenly became twice as many. Chrome shows a notification, but it is so inconspicuous that people who have been using chrome for years did not even know that it exists. And you can’t change, and people mourn this event on the network.
However, colleagues all the time bragged about how cool it is in chrome, how wonderful it is how it can do scripts and how various IDEs love it, I also wanted it so, I was envious, but my two bad habits did not allow me to do this, therefore I pretended I don’t need this your chrome. At one point, I realized that it wasn’t me, I couldn’t live like that anymore, I gathered my will into a fist, and began to read manuals, code examples and other delights of modern Internet. I started with something more important for me - toggle by hotkey (Speak English, EU?).
I must admit, I already googled this problem earlier, and earlier I could not find how to do this, but this time I was lucky. Somehow, I came across a plugin that added a link “Keyboard Shortcuts” to my page of chrome extensions, which, lo and behold, had the option of being global. And even almost always worked. Not all keys can be tied up (for example, my favorite alt + `was impossible, but alt + q is tolerable), but it was possible! Github in the mouth - found how, it turns out that for this you need to write about the following in the manifest:
"commands": ("togglemeister-toggle": ("suggested_key": ("default": "Alt + Q", "mac": "Command + Shift + Q", "linux": "Alt + Q"), "description": "Toggle Chrome Visibility", "global": true))
This is a miracle, not only does it add the ability to assign a command to a hot key, but it also makes it possible to make it global.
Chrome.commands.onCommand.addListener (function (command) (if (command \u003d\u003d\u003d "togglemeister-toggle") (chrome.windows.getCurrent ((), function (win) (if (! Win.focused) (chrome. windows.getCurrent ((), function (win) (chrome.windows.update (win.id, (focused: true), function () ());));) else (chrome.windows.getCurrent ((), function (win) (chrome.windows.update (win.id, (state: "minimized"), function () ());));)));)));
Add locale icons, and in production.
Hooray, one less problem, now I can switch to chrome. And he switched, but the second problem is that I did not see when I received a message in the gazebo with frivolous women, or a letter or maybe new articles appeared on the hub, which the reader read in the ff with a beautiful backlight.
Again, the Internet in the teeth, how do you highlight the update tab. The search quickly led me to despair and impasse. Everything is gone, you can’t paint the tabic, you can’t change the note, we put together a coffin and get used to not being distracted at work at the RSS. And at the moment of despair it occurred to me that you can replace the favicon. The way out is bad, but still the way out.
The code turned out to be hellish, but it worked, several pendants for updates, and (oh my God, what have I done) by timeout passing through all the tabs once a second in order to check if the title of the tab was updated or not.
If there are updates, it’s a matter of technology, we take the current favicon, impose a dot kindly provided by a colleague, replace, ignore this update, so as not to go into the abyss of endless cycles, voila.
Well, a bunch of other things for updates. Not as cool as in ff, but better than nothing.
Once again, links to the chromostor, well, if any:
Togglemeister.
