Install a luminous apple iphone 6. What shape logo is right for you? Choose a color for the glow.

IN lately   The big innovation was that the battery exploded. Have you ever been wrong. . Or the devices just work smoothly. Are they so inferior, this is not scrap? Do you belong to the sect of knowledge? On the other hand, the possibility of repair can be compromised by someone due to the performance and design of the product. Moreover, mobile phoneIf they are held forever, it will cost accordingly. No company takes responsibility without checking if the device is in initial condition, and it is also possible with a faulty device without problems. There may be exceptions, but that the word "repair service" causes pain in many people, this is due to very negative experience. And again, the argument argued for the past. And the rest are again ordinary stubborn phrases against hatred. This shows an extremely high factor of envy in their argument. The conversion is rejected because it was three different errors, and therefore the right to a 3-fold correction was accepted. This clearly showed that you can have failure in every workshop, but if you get original spare parts and also receive installation instructions, the bot does not increase, but decreases. So now we have one more example that cannot be used. . Never had to use a battery, not even with 6 year old phones.

And if you are 16 years old, and he is like Ball to his sparkling brand, which, nevertheless, is good. It’s hard to believe that every year 200 million people think that they would be unique thanks to the purchase. However, in many cases, even after nine years, negligence can still be shown. If you bite from the very beginning on another horse, losing the race after the race, this can cause bitterness. Are you afraid of free competition, are you afraid that these companies will find errors in production?

In Europe, in Germany, such a mafia procedure as a client is simply not used. Please refer to the topic and indicate the reasons why the end customer should be deprived of the right to repair after the expiration of the warranty or a repair service with experience. Only these are original spare parts. Sometimes this is not what you expect. Many sell their equipment in two years and buy new ones. Many people buy two-year equipment and do not use it for two, three years, for half the price. Repair services around the corner did not know what to get for delivery through intermediaries. The client will have even less control to be established. It is already possible to restore certified devices and get guaranteed original spare parts. If so, he is not at the end. For example, for smartphones below 250 euros after two years, and none of them will restore a faulty device. And definitely not with more expensive original parts. The land then was somewhere inconsistent in garbage, while plagiarism producers flooded the market with cheap spare parts. Oh yes: the trolls on the forum have different names, just look. But you do not start a conversation. Always ask the same questions, which seem to me pretty trolligami. After all, quality is, to put it mildly, too modest. . Because you want the client to be “stupid” with maximum profit maximization.

Because you want to control the spare part and the market after entering the market. Because you want to make customers buy new ones, not repair. Because a person wants to monopolize his system platform, where everyone dictates prices and where there are no alternative sellers, since one controls this market.

A difficult warranty service is just a maneuver of deviation from the fact that someone is trying to blame the customer. However, in the case of a nebula, two sides are involved. One who doubts who is dumb. Anyone who buys these products voluntarily should clearly understand the implications before this - and don't complain later. From the user's point of view, such companies are legally compelled - or their products cannot be bought. On the contrary, this is a normal process.

Just relax, nothing is as bad as you think. Such manufacturers want to maintain control of the product beyond the date of purchase and determine its use. With the price of the product everything is compensated. Such manufacturers want to determine the life of the product. This is all for a premature product purchase, but not for the user. These manufacturers are environmentally friendly pollutants. They are about the bonus, not about sustainability. Bad value for money. With recommendations for repair and repair, the user can decide whether he wants to repair or not. Without this, he has no choice at all. This is intentionally occupied by the manufacturer. Thus, the user is suspended from responsibility and deprived of the opportunity. No extension of the planned period of use. If a product can be repaired, its life cycle can be extended. You should look at the whole picture - and not only at its part, if you want to make a correct assessment.

• We know that you are not stupid.
• You are just a little stubbornly negative.
• And your comment is the best proof of this.
• Good weekend.

As a result, the new display did not have a flash in the case, and tightness was not guaranteed. And the store does nothing all day. And now the user should do better at home? But no one remembers this later — it still means years later. Oh yes, Toyota. If such a law existed, the devices would have to be constructed differently in order to be able to comply with the law altogether. If it was common that the devices were being repaired by many different groups, then an explanation of who might have been obscured before the manufacturer charged. An example today is something like a brake failure on a car. It’s completely normal, because it’s normal to work with him. As usual, the smartphone brand first had to ask who did the latter. Therefore, please see what integrity is. However, this suggests that the economic system runs counter to the current one. If lawmakers actually succeed, it would be smartphones, which would be very practical, but only a small fraction of the existing functions. For example, a replaceable battery is hardly possible. The existing repair options, as far as Knut Bear claims, are ample. Also from the fact that people every two years with an extension of the contract receive a new mobile phone. The compact design and easy-to-repair design are not mutually exclusive. Especially, I wrote, you should see it holistically. This affects not only smartphones. With our selfish prosperity and the problem of the first world, we usually do not care about any materials that we need. The right to repair would set the ecological stone in motion already with the basic design, and not just with waste disposal. The possibility of repair cannot be equated with a modular design. If your current business model no longer works, you should come up with a new one. Preserving the "old" structures in changing times knocks down every giant. Well, but precisely because of such far-reaching consequences, because of billions, as it deserves, such a law will not come about in the lobby of these people.

• What would be the effect of such a law?
• Another basic device design.
• This repair right for real designs is conceptually nonsense.

Regardless, perhaps this is not responsible. And you just need to get rid of many of the “ghats” of the last few years in order to develop a sense of how quickly partially legitimate, but sometimes very obscure values \u200b\u200bcan be taken. And this is already perfect 2 years. I have no problem with this, because it is your responsibility that you do with your money. And the manufacturer does not change this intentionally - but with the ignorance of his customers. . This is just the usual grumbling and pointing fingers at others, as usual, and has nothing to do with this issue.

The point is that consumers should be entitled to free repair services and service providers. Errors and poor repair quality are the same in the prescribed workshops as those of the free repair providers. Something like this is illegal or soon, and looks like mafia methods. It states that allegedly specialized workshops cannot be distinguished between dressings of spare parts and originals. All this is rather annoying for the free market, for many self-employed people who do good work every day for good money.

But the roles of the applet have no doubt about such defamations. Where will a free market economy in Europe be if every car can only be repaired in the original workshop? Question: Are repair companies better? With bulky shipping, partly very long time   stay in repair and the result, better than a free dealer, is also not checked and not measured.

But, being too cowardly to face competition, it has already been shown how well this company rated its own repairs.

• Sorry, but the topic is becoming unclear.
• The discussion was perceived by the public as ludicrous.

But why Nebraska should be specially Hacker-Mecca, of course, is not explained. It is also unbelievable if the intended users of the forum are here against the interests of users and for the maximum profit of the manufacturer. The environment is also less stressed. In this case, the state must go through a more difficult time of repair and / or warranty, and the likelihood that the user will also have a long duration will be very positive. Manufacturers should not keep the wrong end.

Every time the battery expands. For note 4, the battery is just 0 and off. If the battery is charged with energy, it is absorbed. Because the media does not wait three weeks, three months or six months. You can push yourself wherever you want, and the issue of responsibility is unlikely to matter when Heratler sits in China and simply signs bankruptcy to continue under a new name. In addition to 5 billion dollars. They would pay a bribe for cheap spare parts. This should no longer be a problem. Or do you want to solder into a smartphone? In the scenario you described, there is no “repair right” premise. This would be not only an immediately suspected manufacturer, but also speculation about the contaminants occurring. If you already have a hypothesis, you must also consider the hypothesis. This pleases the investor, he must pay him what he thinks. Jobs, however, today the business area is being optimized. Of course, the arguments advanced are only advanced. It is about sustainability, preserving resources, as a rule, about a differentiated view of the actual state. Yes, some can do it. But cunning people save their lives. And the devices work with the longest. And there is a recycling program. Below 250 euros, the spare parts stock should be zero. Maybe you have a significant problem understanding the text? And excuse me, Peer, Knut, don’t make you funnier with the ancient “buach”, but you have nothing against the tip of Paulchen, then you can also say nothing about my game with a small bucket. As always with you, no matter how you call yourself. Only a one-time repair on the keyboard is required. Obviously, sustainability does not matter. The search function has detected this. It also applies to androids, but for two, three years already. Music center, streaming client for access to generally accessible legal programs, games. That sounds good, but it's more of a joke. So everyone has their own truth. The manufacturer simply does not predetermine this. It’s just inconvenient, it’s pure maximization of utility from the user's point of view. What project setting is related to the legal requirement of a federal state? Again, to understand: - Nebraska has a bill that should give the consumer the "right to repair." You are complaining about the wrong address, friend. But you already know what you are writing. The discussion is idle if your opponent does not argue, but constantly shouts always the same phrases. This not only makes no sense, but also does not amuse.

• What is the problem?
• However, they could no longer prevent the damage of $ 5 billion.
• Who could they sue for damage?